.png)
In every industry, you’ll find them: people who are comfortable doing things the way they’ve always been done. They wear their traditions like a badge of honor. In the Architecture, Engineering, Construction, and Supply Chain (AECS) world, these individuals resist change, clinging to outdated practices even as technological advances promise to make their lives easier. The fading stars of every profession share a common trait: they steadfastly resist the inevitable evolution that could propel them—and their firms—into the future.
In AECS, technology isn't just an assist, it changes the game. What used to take days or even weeks—calculating loads, drafting designs by hand, coordinating trades—can now be done in minutes. Building Information Modeling (BIM) allows for seamless collaboration, ensuring fewer errors and better efficiency. Laser scanning provides hyper-accurate measurements of job sites, and project management software ensures deadlines aren't missed, and resources are optimally used. Yet, some in the field dig in their heels, refusing to acknowledge the advantages.
Nostalgia Isn’t a Strategy
For many architects, the resistance to 3D modeling and BIM comes from a sense of nostalgia. They remember when 2D drafting was the standard, and they know it inside and out. There's a certain comfort in sticking to what you know, in continuing to use AutoCAD or other 2D tools to sketch out plans and sections.
But as much as 2D drafting has served the industry well in the past, it's no longer enough to meet the demands of modern projects. Sticking to these methods introduces more room for error—misalignments, miscalculations, and coordination issues with other disciplines that are increasingly moving toward 3D modeling and BIM. While 2D drawings may get the job done, they don't provide the same level of insight, precision, or collaboration that 3D tools can offer. This is particularly dangerous given that projects are increasing in complexity, due to both choice and updated code compliance
The Goldilocks Effect: Why Change Is Easy to Avoi
We are currently in what you might call a Goldilocks economy. Business is good, projects are flowing, and the wheels of commerce are turning smoothly. In such an environment, there’s little incentive to change. If everything is running well enough using 2D drafting, why take the risk of adopting something new?
When projects are moving quickly and revenue is strong, inefficiencies can be hidden. Minor errors that stem from 2D drafting—like clashes between different systems or rework due to misinterpretations—can be absorbed by the grease that lubricates the wheels of commerce in a strong economy. Revenue can hide a lot of mistakes. But when the economy slows down, and margins tighten, those inefficiencies come to the forefront. It’s like a game of musical chairs—everything seems fine until the music stops, and suddenly you’re left without a chair.
When projects slow down or clients become more cost-conscious, the AECS professionals who have embraced technology will be the ones who can differentiate their offerings and illustrate how information gets managed by portential clients with more choice, while those who rely solely on 2D drafting may find themselves struggling to keep up.
The Hidden Costs of 2D Drafting
The reluctance to move beyond 2D drafting doesn’t just cost time; it can cost money and credibility. While 2D tools are quick and familiar, they lack the depth that 3D models bring to the table. Coordinating a complex project across multiple disciplines becomes more difficult with 2D drawings. Contractors, engineers, and designers must spend extra time cross-referencing different sets of drawings, increasing the risk of miscommunication and errors.
More importantly, 2D drafting limits your ability to perform detailed analysis during the design process. With BIM, for example, you can run clash detection, energy analysis, and even simulate construction sequences—all things that are impossible with 2D drawings alone. These tools allow architects to deliver a higher quality product, with fewer surprises during construction, which is something that 2D drafting simply can’t match.
Investing in Tomorrow: Keeping the Stars Burning
Firms that will continue to shine in the profession are those who are investing in their future. They recognize that adopting new technology isn’t just about buying software—it’s about rethinking processes, reshaping workflows, and making a cultural shift within the firm. The transition from 2D to 3D drafting, and eventually to BIM, isn’t easy. It requires learning new tools, breaking old habits, and putting in the effort to create new procedures. But for those willing to make the investment, the payoff is significant.
Many professionals are already mature in preparing for the inevitable shift in the industry. They know that as projects become more complex, clients will demand more precision, more transparency, and faster turnarounds. And they’ll be able to deliver, not by working harder, but by working smarter—leveraging technology to do more with less.
From Fading Star to Shining Example
The good news is that it’s never too late to embrace change. Many architects who were once reluctant to adopt BIM have found that, after making the switch, they’re able to design better, faster, and with fewer errors. By moving away from 2D drafting, they’ve positioned themselves as leaders in the field, rather than relics of a bygone era.
The future of architecture is bright for those who are willing to evolve. For those still clinging to 2D drafting, the stars are fading fast. But with a willingness to adapt and invest in new tools, even the most hesitant can find themselves shining once again—leading their firms into the future of architectural design and construction.
The Net-Net
The tools available today have the potential to transform the way architects work, making projects faster, more accurate, and more collaborative. Those who continue to rely solely on 2D drafting risk fading into obscurity, holding onto a past that no longer serves them. In a Goldilocks economy, where everything is going well, it’s easy to avoid change. But when the economy shifts, and clients become more demanding, those who have invested in technology will be the ones who thrive.
It’s time to let go of 2D drafting as the default and embrace the future of architectural design. The stars that shine brightest are those that adapt to their ever-changing environments.
Comments